<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments for evans ink</title>
	<link>http://evansink.com</link>
	<description>Perry Evans' blog on Local Media and other musings.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>Comment on google-iphone surprise: the ripple? by mnorgovudkka</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/02/16/google-iphone-surprise-the-ripple/#comment-72031</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 02:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/02/16/google-iphone-surprise-the-ripple/#comment-72031</guid>
					<description>Hy my name is mnorgovudkka
Im from mongolia
Buy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hy my name is mnorgovudkka<br />
Im from mongolia<br />
Buy
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on google-iphone surprise: the ripple? by clorrorry</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/02/16/google-iphone-surprise-the-ripple/#comment-67053</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 03:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/02/16/google-iphone-surprise-the-ripple/#comment-67053</guid>
					<description>Hi all! 
 
As newly registered user i only wanted to say hello to everyone else who uses this site B-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi all! </p>
<p>As newly registered user i only wanted to say hello to everyone else who uses this site B-)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on feat on the street by David Bruce</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2007/08/06/feat-on-the-street/#comment-65864</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 05:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2007/08/06/feat-on-the-street/#comment-65864</guid>
					<description>I didn't hear of this... is google still doing the $2 payment + $8 if they verify thing?

I've got a couple of businesses I could add to Gmaps

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t hear of this&#8230; is google still doing the $2 payment + $8 if they verify thing?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a couple of businesses I could add to Gmaps</p>
<p>thanks
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on aggregate, filtrate and curate by Eric Fredine</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/11/17/aggregate-filtrate-and-curate/#comment-58408</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 21:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/11/17/aggregate-filtrate-and-curate/#comment-58408</guid>
					<description>Hey Perry,

Good description of the problem and some of the solutions being pursued.  

What I really want is a personalized recommendation engine approach - as in I like these restaurants in Edmonton, what other restaurants might I be interested in.  And for bonus points: when I travel to Denver what restaurants might I want to consider there?

The Netflix Prize has driven a lot of research in to collaborative filtering techniques.  I'm surprised that nobody has yet attempted to apply this to the local information.  Part of the challenge is in getting enough input from many users to build a profile -- but once you get to a critical mass you'd also have a huge network effect.

Cheers,
Eric</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Perry,</p>
<p>Good description of the problem and some of the solutions being pursued.  </p>
<p>What I really want is a personalized recommendation engine approach - as in I like these restaurants in Edmonton, what other restaurants might I be interested in.  And for bonus points: when I travel to Denver what restaurants might I want to consider there?</p>
<p>The Netflix Prize has driven a lot of research in to collaborative filtering techniques.  I&#8217;m surprised that nobody has yet attempted to apply this to the local information.  Part of the challenge is in getting enough input from many users to build a profile &#8212; but once you get to a critical mass you&#8217;d also have a huge network effect.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Eric
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the distracting power of twitter by staff</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/09/05/the-distracting-power-of-twitter/#comment-32490</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/09/05/the-distracting-power-of-twitter/#comment-32490</guid>
					<description>You might want to check out Twitter in Plain English (www.commoncraft.com/twitter) a 2.5 minute video describing Twitter in a manner most people can comprehend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might want to check out Twitter in Plain English (www.commoncraft.com/twitter) a 2.5 minute video describing Twitter in a manner most people can comprehend.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on praize be by Harry</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/07/09/praize-be/#comment-11643</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 11:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/07/09/praize-be/#comment-11643</guid>
					<description>Thank you for the compliment(s)!

Harry</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for the compliment(s)!</p>
<p>Harry
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on we&#8217;re in the neighborhood by Perry</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/05/27/were-in-the-neighborhood/#comment-11033</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/05/27/were-in-the-neighborhood/#comment-11033</guid>
					<description>Great commentary...

I agree that there is "something about walkable communities" - I personally live in one. However, I think you underestimate the suburban neighborhood resident's desire for "event" content - think of the life systems of school, sports, garage sales as leading examples. The pull towards community pride/issues is often strong in suburban communities.  

Unrelated, I am equally interested in a person's SET of preferred or active neighborhoods as being a key piece of the local search and social feed landscape. I personally live in two places, shop in another place or two, and dine in any of 4-5 neighborhoods. I also have a few favorite neighborhoods in places i travel to routinely, and have sentimental attachments to a couple of places I used to live. All of those define information consumption patterns of interest.  

This space has multiple dimensions and will evolve in many ways.  We're just getting started... Thx for the insightful perspective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great commentary&#8230;</p>
<p>I agree that there is &#8220;something about walkable communities&#8221; - I personally live in one. However, I think you underestimate the suburban neighborhood resident&#8217;s desire for &#8220;event&#8221; content - think of the life systems of school, sports, garage sales as leading examples. The pull towards community pride/issues is often strong in suburban communities.  </p>
<p>Unrelated, I am equally interested in a person&#8217;s SET of preferred or active neighborhoods as being a key piece of the local search and social feed landscape. I personally live in two places, shop in another place or two, and dine in any of 4-5 neighborhoods. I also have a few favorite neighborhoods in places i travel to routinely, and have sentimental attachments to a couple of places I used to live. All of those define information consumption patterns of interest.  </p>
<p>This space has multiple dimensions and will evolve in many ways.  We&#8217;re just getting started&#8230; Thx for the insightful perspective.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on we&#8217;re in the neighborhood by R Haussmann</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/05/27/were-in-the-neighborhood/#comment-11018</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/05/27/were-in-the-neighborhood/#comment-11018</guid>
					<description>I’d be curious as to how a neighborhood is constructed affects the tool usage. An urban neighborhood with mixed business/residential has a different make up from a suburban neighborhood (with blocks of residential with strip mall breaks). I always had the theory that the break seems to come from if you need to get in a car or not to get a drink. I was looking at this site ... http://www.walkscore.com/ ... which shows how "walkable" your location is to businesses and other destinations. 

It would seem that the Facebook app is going to gear toward the “walkable” neighborhoods where events are actually occurring (as opposed to “pizza at the pool” in a suburb). I would expect that I would sign up for a neighborhood other than my own to find out about those events and businesses in those neighborhoods. Even then, I find myself more loyal to businesses (and the people who run them) than an actual location. Suburbs might end up being limited to schools, community pools and smaller churches.

Taking my car, another mile or so isn't going to make a difference as to where I shop or eat where that difference is significant if I'm on foot. A shared location (a pub, a park, a street of restaurants surrounded by residential) seems to create community loyalty. 

I'm surprised more developers don't push business/residential communities more. Those neighborhoods always seem to be a premium despite the size of the actual housing. Yet developers doggedly keep building suburban enclaves. 

I'd be curious to hear a report on how your app works differently in different types of neighborhoods. I'd venture to guess that you'll see more “walkable” neighborhoods participating in the app and neighborhoods being more like “categories” than actual gathering destinations or events.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’d be curious as to how a neighborhood is constructed affects the tool usage. An urban neighborhood with mixed business/residential has a different make up from a suburban neighborhood (with blocks of residential with strip mall breaks). I always had the theory that the break seems to come from if you need to get in a car or not to get a drink. I was looking at this site &#8230; <a href="http://www.walkscore.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.walkscore.com/</a> &#8230; which shows how &#8220;walkable&#8221; your location is to businesses and other destinations. </p>
<p>It would seem that the Facebook app is going to gear toward the “walkable” neighborhoods where events are actually occurring (as opposed to “pizza at the pool” in a suburb). I would expect that I would sign up for a neighborhood other than my own to find out about those events and businesses in those neighborhoods. Even then, I find myself more loyal to businesses (and the people who run them) than an actual location. Suburbs might end up being limited to schools, community pools and smaller churches.</p>
<p>Taking my car, another mile or so isn&#8217;t going to make a difference as to where I shop or eat where that difference is significant if I&#8217;m on foot. A shared location (a pub, a park, a street of restaurants surrounded by residential) seems to create community loyalty. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m surprised more developers don&#8217;t push business/residential communities more. Those neighborhoods always seem to be a premium despite the size of the actual housing. Yet developers doggedly keep building suburban enclaves. </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to hear a report on how your app works differently in different types of neighborhoods. I&#8217;d venture to guess that you&#8217;ll see more “walkable” neighborhoods participating in the app and neighborhoods being more like “categories” than actual gathering destinations or events.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on the wagging tail of local vertical by Nigel</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/05/07/the-wagging-tail-of-local-vertical/#comment-9490</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/05/07/the-wagging-tail-of-local-vertical/#comment-9490</guid>
					<description>Great Post, Might be worth taking a look at YouPage.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post, Might be worth taking a look at YouPage.com
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on mine the gap by Pierre-Antoine Durgeat</title>
		<link>http://evansink.com/2008/05/14/mine-the-gap/#comment-9489</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 08:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://evansink.com/2008/05/14/mine-the-gap/#comment-9489</guid>
					<description>Hi Perry,

Thanks for pointing this out.

This can also be seen as an opportunity to get lost cost pay-per-click advertising for all those brand new hyper-local websites like us :-)

Pierre-Antoine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Perry,</p>
<p>Thanks for pointing this out.</p>
<p>This can also be seen as an opportunity to get lost cost pay-per-click advertising for all those brand new hyper-local websites like us :-)</p>
<p>Pierre-Antoine
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
